Skip to content
SchoolBoardNews

Superintendent Chris Reykdal: The Legislature must amply fund K‑12 schools in the 2027 session as the Constitution requires

Reported byNorthwest Progressive Institute

Read original reporting

AI-assisted summary

Washington's state schools superintendent, Chris Reykdal, told the Northwest Progressive Institute that he believes the state is currently failing its constitutional duty to amply fund K-12 education. He made the comments after releasing his 2027 budget priorities on September 10, 2026. The article notes that the state Supreme Court ended its oversight of the McCleary school funding case in June 2018, but says that did not settle whether funding is adequate.

For the next two-year budget, Reykdal's office (OSPI) asks for $503.5 million in added basic-education money in 2028 and $693.4 million in 2029, about $1.2 billion in total. It separately seeks roughly $755 million more for the Learning Assistance Program, Transition to Kindergarten and elementary math professional development. OSPI estimates that inflation alone has opened a gap of about $633.4 million a year compared with per-student funding in 2018-19.

Reykdal also says lawmakers erred in 2017 by cutting local levies as part of the McCleary response, and argues that property-poor communities need more resources. Attorney Tom Ahearne, who represented the McCleary plaintiffs, says basic education must be funded before other priorities. The article says another lawsuit is possible if lawmakers do not act. The Legislature's 105-day session begins in January 2027.

Why it matters

The state budget the Legislature writes in 2027 will shape how much money districts get for basic education and how much they depend on local levies. Families, staff and local taxpayers may feel the effects, and the article says a new court fight is possible.

  • State funding formula
  • State legislature
  • Court ruling
  • School levy
  • Property taxes

Written with AI from the publisher's article and may contain errors. The original reporting is the authoritative source.

Sign in to react.

Questions to discuss
  • How should the state weigh funding basic education against other public services when revenue is limited?
  • What role should local levies play in paying for schools in communities with very different property wealth?
  • Is restoring 2018-19 per-student funding adjusted for inflation a reasonable measure of adequate school funding?

Suggested with AI.

Public discussion (0)

Share how this affects your community. Be respectful, stay on topic, and don't post personal information. Editors may hide comments that break these rules.