Skip to content

Hopewell Valley Students Outperform State on Graduation Assessments

Reported byMercerMe

Image: MercerMeRequest removal
Read the full story at MercerMe

AI-assisted summary

The Hopewell Valley Regional School District told its Board of Education on Oct. 12 that students scored above New Jersey averages on the spring 2026 graduation proficiency assessment, taken by 11th graders in English language arts and math. An assistant superintendent said overall graduation readiness was about 89%. Because the state moved to an adaptive format this year, she advised treating the results as a new baseline rather than comparing them directly with earlier years.

Readiness varied by group: 98% for general education students, 94% for students with Section 504 plans, 82% for students receiving free or reduced-price lunch, and 56% for students receiving special education services. The district noted that some groups were small, including 17 students in the lunch category and 34 in special education. It also reported gains among Black students, from 50% to 79%, and said Hispanic students reached 85%.

The meeting covered other topics too. Officials said school-device monitoring tools such as ClassLink and Securly hold data but do not yet easily produce districtwide screen-time reports, and the district plans to survey teachers. A report on anti-bullying efforts found all schools exceeded state minimums. A board member presented a preliminary survey of 310 high school students in which 75% backed letting 16- and 17-year-olds vote in school board elections. A fuller report is expected by the end of 2026, and the board could advocate for the change but not make it alone.

Why it matters

The results show where the district is doing well and where gaps remain, especially for students receiving special education services and those from lower-income households. The screen-time and voting-age discussions also show how the board is weighing technology oversight and student voice in governance.

  • Test scores
  • Graduation rates
  • Special education services
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Elected school boards

Written with AI from the publisher's article and may contain errors. The original reporting is the authoritative source.

Sign in to react.

Questions to discuss
  • How should the district interpret and share results from a new adaptive test when direct comparisons with earlier years are not advised?
  • What supports could help narrow gaps for students receiving special education services or free or reduced-price lunch?
  • How should a school board balance monitoring school-issued devices with student privacy and educational uses?

Suggested with AI.

Public discussion (0)

Share how this affects your community. Be respectful, stay on topic, and don't post personal information. Editors may hide comments that break these rules.