District 300 $355.5M Bond Referendum: What to Know
Reported byHoodline
Read the full story at HoodlineAI-assisted summary
Community Unit School District 300, which spans parts of McHenry, Kane, Cook and DeKalb counties in Illinois, has put a $355.5 million bond question on the November 3 ballot. The district says its schools average about 50 years old and that it expects roughly 4,000 more students over the next decade. The money would fund part of a master facility plan with more than 20 projects and a total cost of $442.5 million, with the district adding $87 million of its own funds.
The school board voted 7-0 on July 21 to place the largest of three options, called Plan C, on the ballot. Two cheaper options were presented in June. The smallest, with $250 million in bonds, was structured to avoid raising the tax rate because it would replace retiring debt. Plan C borrows beyond that. District documents cited by the reporting estimate about $101 more per year for 25 years on a $400,000 home. Planned work includes roof repairs, secured entries, classroom additions, renovations, and a career and technical education center for all three high schools.
Supporters include the group Advance 300 and a political action committee of district employee unions. Opponents include local Republican groups and a group called District 300 IL Watchdogs, who cite concerns about property taxes. The district has scheduled five public information sessions, the first three on consecutive days and two more on October 28 and 29, all at 6 p.m.
Why it matters
Voters in several counties will decide whether to take on new long-term borrowing for building repairs, safety upgrades and expanded programs. The outcome affects property tax bills for 25 years, as well as the condition and capacity of schools serving more than 20,000 students.
- Bond measure
- Property taxes
- Board vote
- New construction
- Building repairs
- Career and technical education
Written with AI from the publisher's article and may contain errors. The original reporting is the authoritative source.
Sign in to react.
- How should a district weigh a lower-cost facility option against a larger plan that covers more projects but raises property taxes?
- What information would help voters in different towns and counties understand how the bond would affect them?
- Which facility priorities, such as safety, repairs, capacity or career programs, should come first if funding is limited?
Suggested with AI.
Public discussion (0)
Share how this affects your community. Be respectful, stay on topic, and don't post personal information. Editors may hide comments that break these rules.