Skip to content

High school district moves forward with land swap for additional campus

Reported byBenitoLink

Read the full story at BenitoLink

AI-assisted summary

The San Benito High School District board of trustees took two steps in September toward building a second campus. On Sept. 8, it approved swapping the 49.68-acre Pura Vida parcel for the 33.58-acre Thomas Orchard parcel, with the district also paying an extra $1.5 million for the smaller property. County planners had found that a school on the Thomas Orchard land would not match the land use designation in the county's General Plan, which guides growth in unincorporated areas. The article notes that school districts are not bound by local land use rules; instead, the state education department must approve a school's location and the state architect must approve construction.

On Sept. 22, trustees unanimously passed two resolutions stating the district's intent to use eminent domain to acquire a third parcel next to the Borelli-Felice land it already owns. The district says it tried several times to negotiate. An Aug. 31 letter offered the Dotta Revocable Living Trust $1.4 million based on a 2023 appraisal, though the offer could change with an updated appraisal. The district has six months after adopting its resolution to file an eminent domain lawsuit in San Benito Superior Court. The article says all three parcels are zoned agricultural and were farmed.

The district says a facilities committee of more than 60 people chose west Hollister because of expected growth. Voters rejected two $70 million bonds in 2024. The district says it still plans to use state grants and developer impact fees. It is also considering its Best Road site, owned since 1997, for 1,000 workforce housing units.

Why it matters

The decisions show how a district can advance a new school without local land use approval and how it plans to pay for one after voters turned down bonds. Taxpayers, nearby landowners and families may care about the cost, the use of eminent domain and the school's location.

  • Board vote
  • New construction
  • Bond measure
  • District property sales

Written with AI from the publisher's article and may contain errors. The original reporting is the authoritative source.

Sign in to react.

Questions to discuss
  • How should the district weigh county planning findings when choosing a school site that it is not legally required to follow?
  • What information would help residents understand the use of eminent domain for a new campus?
  • How should the district pay for a second high school now that two bond measures did not pass?

Suggested with AI.

Public discussion (0)

Share how this affects your community. Be respectful, stay on topic, and don't post personal information. Editors may hide comments that break these rules.