Judge clears way for state takeover board to take control of Memphis schools
Reported byChalkbeatBy Bri HatchBri Hatch's page at the publisher (opens in a new tab)
Student groups in this story
Why these groups?
- Black students: Mentions “Black” in our summary
Tags come from the headline and our own notes, never the publisher's article. Wrong tag? Use “Report an issue” below.
%3A%0A){kind=link}
AI-assisted preview
A federal judge, Waverly Crenshaw, has lifted the temporary hold he put on the state's takeover of Memphis-Shelby County Schools in late June. The order came on a Thursday, after more than three months of legal delays. It lets the appointed Education Oversight Board begin directing the district.
According to the article, the board can now override most major district decisions, including approving the yearly budget and closing schools. It also has authority to choose a new superintendent and to rework what and how students are taught. Board Chair Billy Orgel said the group is ready to start and called for teamwork from educators, parents, students and the community. At a meeting the previous week, the board fast-tracked key policies, though members argued over whether it was proper to adopt materials from consulting firm MGT prepared during the pause. Orgel said local philanthropists paid for that work, which he argued made it legal. Members did not agree on where or when to meet next.
The district's lawsuit against the takeover continues, and both sides must present evidence. Last Tuesday, district leaders filed an amended complaint alleging the state is singling out a mostly Black student body because of race and that the takeover diverts money to board salaries. A separate chancery court suit is also pending. District board chair Tamarques Porter said he disagrees with the ruling.
Why it matters
The ruling shifts authority over Memphis schools' budget, school closures, leadership and curriculum to an appointed body, which affects families, staff and taxpayers. Court cases challenging the takeover are still unresolved, so the outcome remains uncertain.
- State takeover
- Court ruling
- Board governance
- Superintendent search
- Racial disparities
- Transparency and open records
A short preview written with AI from the publisher's article. It may contain errors; the full story has the details and is the authoritative source. Our editorial standards.
Read the full story at Chalkbeat (opens in a new tab)Questions to discuss
- How should an appointed oversight board and the elected local board share information and communicate with families during a transition like this?
- What kinds of evidence would help the community judge whether the takeover is helping or harming students?
- How should outside consultants and philanthropic funding be disclosed when a public board relies on their work?
Suggested with AI.
Public discussion
Share how this affects your community. Be respectful, stay on topic, and don't post personal information. Editors may hide comments that break these rules.