Skip to content

Shaw and Barrera Offer Starkly Different Visions for California Schools

Reported byLA School Report

Student groups in this story

Why these groups?
  • LGBTQ+: Mentions “transgender”, “LGBTQ”, “gender identity” in our keywords

Tags come from the headline and our own notes, never the publisher's article. Wrong tag? Use “Report an issue” below.

Discuss
Image: LA School ReportReport a problem with this photo
Read at LA School Report (opens in a new tab)

AI-assisted preview

Two local school board presidents, Sonja Shaw of Chino Valley Unified and Richard Barrera of San Diego Unified, are the finalists for California state superintendent of public instruction. They advanced from a ten-person primary, beating three veteran Democratic legislators among others, and will meet in the nonpartisan general election on Nov. 3. Ballot counting was unfinished, with about 1.4 million ballots outstanding, but Shaw was ahead of Barrera in the tally at that point. According to the article, no one outside the state legislature has won the job since 1982.

The two disagree on several issues. Shaw opposes state rules that let transgender students join girls sports teams and rules that bar districts from requiring staff to tell parents about a student's gender identity or orientation. She says the state should not spend more overall but should get more money into classrooms, and she is critical of ethnic studies. Barrera supports the state policies, wants more school funding, and backs ethnic studies. He says he would enforce civil rights protections for LGBTQ+ students in every district. The governor's office says fewer than 10 transgender athletes played K-12 sports last year among nearly 6 million students.

Both candidates cite test score gains and above-average graduation rates in their districts. A California Teachers Association committee put $5 million toward Barrera's campaign, while Shaw reported raising $165,000 this year. A Democratic consultant quoted in the article expects a highly partisan contest.

Why it matters

The state superintendent leads the California Department of Education, so the winner will influence policy on funding, student rights and curriculum affecting families and staff statewide. The article shows the candidates hold sharply different positions on those issues.

  • Candidate profiles
  • Election results
  • Transgender students
  • Parental notification
  • Test scores

A short preview written with AI from the publisher's article. It may contain errors; the full story has the details and is the authoritative source. Our editorial standards.

Read the full story at LA School Report (opens in a new tab)
Discuss

Questions to discuss

  • How should voters weigh a candidate's local district results against their positions on statewide education policy?
  • What role should campaign spending by unions and political groups play in how voters judge candidates for a nonpartisan school office?
  • How could a state superintendent balance different views on student rights and parental involvement across very different districts?

Suggested with AI.

Public discussion

Share how this affects your community. Be respectful, stay on topic, and don't post personal information. Editors may hide comments that break these rules.